Make text bigger  Make text smaller  Toggle background color  Bookmark/Share

Albums of the decade No 10: Burial – Untrue


HEADLINE FEED // [READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE]

Observer Music Monthly starts the countdown to the best album of the decade with this melancholic masterclass from dubstep’s dark knight

In an era when musicians revealed their private lives to the public via MySpace and Twitter, when even the biggest stars were stripped of enigma by the paparazzi or in the pages of Heat, the idea of anonymity suddenly seemed powerful, if you knew how to use it. So when electronic music prodigy Burial released his self-titled debut album in 2006, declining even to identify himself, let alone submit to photographs and interviews, it certainly lent his soulful take on the era’s key sub-genre – dubstep – extra mystique. By the time its successor, 2007’s Untrue, won a Mercury prize nomination, and Burial was being hyped as the next Aphex Twin – a whiz kid from the margins set to impact on the mainstream – the myth was powerful enough for one tabloid to start a campaign to name him.

In the end, Burial saved them the bother by quickly “outing” himself as William Bevan, a young south Londoner reared on 1990s drum’n'bass and garage. Untrue married the former’s sense of scale with the latter’s fleetness of foot, adding a sadness that was unique to Bevan. It was soaked in a particularly urban melancholy: the 3am blues of In McDonald’s was instantly recognisable to anyone who’s ever been stuck in a fast food outlet in the early hours with only a styrofoam cup of coffee for warmth. While other dubstep artists grew colder and more alienated, Bevan outstripped his peers by heading in the opposite direction, conjuring emotion from disembodied female vocal samples and old videogames. These were explicit links between rave’s past and its thriving offspring in the present, who were still plugging away in the underground, occasionally yielding up something truly special.

Buy this Sunday’s Observer for the full top 50 countdown, plus an interview with the winner.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds




Toddla T’s music guide to Sheffield


HEADLINE FEED // [READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE]

The Steel City’s music scene has produced such luminaries as Pulp and Arctic Monkeys. Toddla T shows us where to hear the Sheffield sound





Bibio: The Apple and the Tooth | CD review


HEADLINE FEED // [READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE]

(Warp)

One-third new tracks and two-thirds remixes by friends, colleagues and admirers – this isn’t quite a follow-up to Stephen Wilkinson’s Warp debut, Ambivalence Avenue, but it’s more than mere between-albums filler. There are four new tracks and they’re all expert, full of electronic papier-mache layers of arpeggiated guitars, glitchy drum patterns and joyful percussive samples. Combined they emit hints of early, day-glo hip-hop, Warp sonic ambition and introspection. The remixes are, in parts, much darker. San Francisco-based dubstepper Eskmo turns Dwrcan into an ominous Panorama montage of a track, and fellow Warp artist Clark overdubs S’Vive with a new beat that’s as menacing as a nihilistic Millwall fan’s internal monologue. Not all are made sinister, though – there’s a great synthetic upbeat rendering of Sugarette by sometime Friendly Fires man Rob Lee (aka Wax Stag) that’s eloquent enough to remind the listener of Kraftwerk. Yet, despite the added value of the remixes and the quality of the original tracks, The Apple and the Tooth remains a complementary piece – albeit one that’s a compliment to Bibio’s craft, too.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds




Gary Numan | Pop review


HEADLINE FEED // [READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE]

Brighton Dome

Viewers of BBC4’s Synth Britannia would have seen Gary Numan’s peers virtually queuing up to heap praise on Middlesex’s foremost purveyor of dystopian pop electronica. Which was something of a surprise: at the height of his fame, one of Numan’s weirder characteristics was his ability to attract hatred from other musicians. His hero David Bowie had him thrown off a television show, then wrote a song about how much he disliked him. “I’ve never met the guy,” chipped in Mick Jagger, “but he’s one of those people you absolutely loathe.”

Listening to him perform his biggest album, 1979’s The Pleasure Principle, it’s difficult to see why anyone was so upset by him, unless they had an aversion to choral-sounding synthesizers and songs about alienated robots: Engineers and Conversation bear the mark of a man adept at balancing commerciality with more avant-garde concerns. That’s not to say there aren’t problems here. In more recent years, Numan has reinvented himself as a godfather of industrial rock. Occasionally, The Pleasure Principle’s songs sound awkward resting on top of the genre’s standard-issue distorted bass guitar and pummelling drums, something that, to his credit, doesn’t seem to pass Numan by. “That was a bit rubbish actually,” he offers between songs.

Indeed, he seems more comfortable performing newer material. So do his fans: weirdly subdued even during Cars, they get more excited when he breaks out the distorted guitars, which must be gratifying for the man on stage: perhaps uniquely among his 80s contemporaries, Numan’s fans seem less interested in his past than his present. Headbanging, synthpop’s former whipping boy looks like a man enjoying the last laugh.

At Sub 29, Cardiff (02920 230 130) tonight, then touring.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds




Beck records musical response to Fiery Furnaces feud


HEADLINE FEED // [READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE]

In response to the Fiery Furnaces’ online rant about Radiohead, the singer has released a tune in tribute to the late avant-garde composer Harry Partch

After he was insulted by the Fiery Furnaces’ Matt Friedberger, Beck has issued a musical retort, recording a song that references composer Harry Partch’s 43-tone scale. His passive-aggressive comeback, Harry Partch, can now be heard on his website.

Perhaps we should explain the background to this feud. On 3 November, the notoriously cantankerous Friedberger criticised Radiohead. That’s right – not Beck, Radiohead. Having learned that the Oxford group had recorded a tribute to first world war veteran Harry Patch, Friedberger reportedly misheard “Harry Patch” as “Harry Partch”, the late American avant-garde musician. “Fuck you!” he responded to the band. “You brand yourself by brazenly and arbitrarily associating yourself with things that you know people consider cool. That is bogus. That’s a put-on. That’s a branding technique and Radiohead have their brand that they’re popular and intelligent … How’s the song? Is it 48 notes to the octave? What does it have to do with Harry Patch? Oh, my wife says I am being very rude. She doesn’t like me insulting Radiohead. She’s afraid they will send their lackeys through the computer to sabotage us. But they needn’t worry – we are a band that sabotages ourselves.”

For bloggers who thrive on indie rivalries, this was fine fodder. While Radiohead did not respond, Friedberger’s diatribe blazed across the blogosphere. Eventually, the Fiery Furnaces issued a follow-up statement, stoking the fires even further: “Matt has not heard the Radiohead song about Harry Patch, but if he did, he is sure he wouldn’t like it. No doubt Radiohead and their fans can ignore his opinion on this matter and continue with their triumphant artistic interventions. Matt would have much preferred to insult Beck but he is too afraid of Scientologists.”

It should have ended there – with a dig at Beck’s religious beliefs. Instead, Beck now seems to have taken the furore one step further, releasing Harry Partch – a song about the celebrated composer who loved microtonality and marimbas. According to Beck’s website, the tune “employs Partch’s 43 tone scale, which expands conventional tonality into a broader variation of frequencies and resonances”.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds




Alexis Petridis on singing out of tune


HEADLINE FEED // [READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE]

‘Singing out of tune can convey emotions that being in tune can’t’

One of the weirder side effects of watching The X Factor is that I’ve started to think singing in tune is hugely overrated. It’s a central tenet of the show that singers should be note-perfect, the ideal being the melisma-heavy, high-octane style practised by R&B vocalists, who are all talent and no taste. I suspect at least 250,000 people agree with me: that’s how many people bought the debut album by La Roux, whose trademark falsetto tends to flail around only in the approximate vicinity of the tune.

Her wobbliness lends a fragility to songs like Bulletproof, undermining its lyrical feistiness. It’s proof that singing out of tune can convey emotions that being in tune can’t: frailty, insouciance, sarcasm, anger. All the melismas in the world can’t pack the emotional punch of Billie Holiday’s ravaged voice on her 1958 album Lady in Satin.

There are, of course, limits to how much off-key singing a body can stand: mine are tested by former Stone Roses frontman Ian Brown, who seems to be no more qualified to be a singer than he is to operate the Hadron Collider. In contrast, my favourite bit of bad singing comes on Soft Cell’s 1981 debut album, Non-Stop Erotic Cabaret, which gave us a song called Seedy Films. Marc Almond would later flourish into a great vocalist in a male torch-singer style. But at this point, he wasn’t capable of conveying an atmosphere of sultry, transgressive eroticism via improvised scat singing – which, alas, is what he spends most of Seedy Films trying to do. The overall effect is pathetic in the extreme, but it works. After all, so was the place they were trying to capture, the long-lost Soho of furtive punters visiting “blue movie” cinemas.

As Matthew Sweet’s peerless book Shepperton Babylon explains, the films shown were both unsexy and extravagantly dishonest: what was advertised as pornography turned out to be sub-Carry On comedies with added nudity. “The posters promised explicitness they could not hope to deliver,” writes Sweet.

That’s exactly what Seedy Films sounds like: a world that promises thrillingly unbridled licentiousness, but doles out something laughably feeble instead. If he was singing in tune, it wouldn’t do anything of the sort.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds