Make text bigger  Make text smaller  Toggle background color  Bookmark/Share

No 9: Salif Keita – Moffou


HEADLINE FEED // [READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE]

West Africa produced many outstanding releases during the noughties, but the Malian singer’s stark and haunting album was the most remarkable

By normal industry standards, waiting until you’re 53 to make the best album of your career is perhaps leaving it a bit late. But then not much about Salif Keita’s story is normal.

Was it a blessing or a curse for this Malian teenager – already singled out for being albino, and of royal descent – to find that he had one of the most remarkable voices anybody in the neighbourhood had ever heard? On the one hand, it set him apart and ahead of the competition to be invited to sing with two leading west African bands during the 1970s. On the other, it led to expectations that perhaps Keita could be something more than the most famous singer in west Africa – what about conquering the rest of the world? In 1987, the album Soro, expensively and elaborately produced in Paris, announced Keita’s arrival in the English-speaking world.

For the following 15 years, it was almost as if he wilfully defied the hopes and expectations of those who had supported him, insisting on electric guitarists and synthesiser players in his recordings and for his live shows, despite entreaties that his music should sound less like Phil Collins and Peter Gabriel and more Malian.

Finally, astonishingly, in 2002 Keita relented and delivered the album Moffou, which was exactly what his fans had been praying for. First impressions were that this change of tack was mostly acoustic, but there are many subtle interventions of electric guitar and electronic effects. Moffou might feel like a natural, spontaneous recording, but clearly a lot of thought went in at every stage, from songwriting to arrangements and post-production – and, of course, the singing. If the plan was to deliver a classic album, it succeeded.

One of Keita’s distinctive qualities as a songwriter is to set his own voice against female vocalists, and virtually every track here showcases this skill, starting with Yamore, a duet with the Cape Verdean singer Cesária Évora. The combination of the two voices seemed counterintuitive, with Keita being typically extravagant and Évora being laidback. But it works brilliantly, and behind them both, those gorgeous backing vocals answer and comment.

Two other tracks stand out as the high points of a consistently lovely record. On Moussolou, Keita’s tribute to women, his gentle vocal is carried along by rippling guitars and percussion. On the haunting Baba, a traditional instrument plays an echoing melody in the background.

Moffou signalled what was to become a hugely successful 10 years for Malian music – in fact, the decade would end with a raft of pop and indie acts looking to the country for inspiration. West Africa provided several outstanding albums during the noughties, but most musicians would surely salute Keita’s album as the pinnacle.

Buy this Sunday’s Observer for the full top 50 countdown, plus an interview with the winner


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds




New band of the day – No 674: Rox


HEADLINE FEED // [READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE]

This south London singer’s perky pop-soul tunes suggest that she may be an Amy, Adele or Duffy for 2010, but not without strong competition

Hometown: Norbury, London.

The lineup: Rox (vocals).

The background: We keep thinking we’ve heard all the major female contenders for 2010, but as Todd Rundgren once sang, “There’s always more”. And they all seem poised to succeed. Trouble is, Ellie Goulding in the UK and Sky Ferreira in the States, the two female performers most likely to next year, are operating in quite different areas, whereas Rox, Rough Trade’s latest signing and a 22-year-old from south London, has staked a claim to the densely populated pop-soul terrain already occupied by newbie Clare Maguire as well as the original retro-soul girls Amy, Adele and Duffy. It’s actually not a million miles away, either, from the showier Paloma Faith while her chirrupy delivery reminds us of the girl group/indie-soul stylings of Remi Nicole whose recent second album didn’t even see a release. But she does what she does – sing and write perky pop-soul tunes – pretty well. Whether or not she does it sufficiently differently is another matter, so unless the Big Three radically change direction (and rumour has it that Adele is working with someone quite unexpected on her second album) Rox is going to have tough competition with her 2010 debut album, from both within and outside Rough Trade, who also happen to manage Duffy.

The half-Persian/half-Jamaican singer-songwriter is a priority for Rough Trade, though, and they’ve been working hard to build a reputation for her. Rox has already performed at this year’s Reading festival (with Wiley) and the BBC’s Electric Proms (with Nitin Sawhney) and her finger-snapping single I Don’t Believe has been used to soundtrack a Rimmel TV ad. She also stood in for Amy Winehouse, singing Valerie at a Mark Ronson show, and she performed two tracks on Later With Jools Holland last week (we remember VV Brown was on similarly early in her career – hmm …). She describes her songs as “like the written pages in my diary – personal, honest, and all the subjects and words are real”. The biggest influence on her lyrics is “love, tragedy and all that other good stuff that makes art enjoyable”, while musically she draws on gospel, country and R&B, and artists as varied as Alanis Morissette (“for the teenage angst”) to Eva Cassidy (“she kept me in touch with my emotional side”).

Of the tracks we’ve heard, I Don’t Believe and My Baby Left Me are the most instantly infectious and squarely in the 60s soul pastiche camp, while Rocksteady is as the title suggests a Lovers Rock homage (delivered straighter than that other new girl, Coco Sumner, does reggae). Her new single No Going Back is gospel-tinged Motown-esque soul-pop. Vocally, although mightily efficient, she’s not as extraordinary as some. We mean that both ways – she hasn’t quite found her “voice” yet. She could have written her songs for any number of female singers. Then again, she could be a bit of a Corinne Bailey Rae, who seemed lightweight at the start but whose second album is currently being hailed as a masterpiece. Rox may not have anything truly original to say right now, and she may not do so for some time, but she would appear to be an artist who is perhaps worth sticking with over the distance. Meanwhile, we’d suggest pushing her in the direction of a UK Erykah Badu …

The buzz: “Stunningly soulful.”

The truth: We wouldn’t wish Corinne Bailey Rae’s annus horribilis on anyone, but we can’t help thinking Rox will need to live a little before she produces anything truly great.

Most likely to: Marry Andre 3000.

Least likely to: Use L’Oreal.

What to buy: No Going Back is released by Rough Trade on 7 December.

File next to: Adele, Amy, Corinne Bailey Rae, Paloma Faith.

Links: myspace.com/roxmusik

Tomorrow’s new band: Alex Gardner.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds




‘Nubian monkey’ song and Arab racism | Nesrine Malik


HEADLINE FEED // [READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE]

The fairness of Lebanese singer Haifa Wehbe’s skin makes her patronising lyric all the more problematic for black Egyptians

Haifa Wehbe, a popular Lebanese pop singer, has always been a controversial figure. The queen of a relatively new breed of voluptuous, coquettish starlets, her provocative lyrics, attire and music videos have won her popularity among Arab men who lust after her, women who want to emulate her, and now children targeted by her latest album. It is in objection to allegedly racially insulting lyrics from this album that a group of Nubian lawyers submitted an official complaint to Egypt’s public prosecutor calling for one of the songs to be banned.

The offending track, Baba Feen, a children’s ditty shot in a bizarre Alice-in-Wonderland-meets-Teletubbies video, features Wehbe as a very sexy mother trying to cajole her young son into going back to bed – which he refuses to do unless she meets several demands, one of which is to fetch him his teddy bear and “Nubian monkey”.

This perceived reference to black Egyptians has provoked anger among the country’s Nubian minority and the diva is now facing claims that the song’s lyrics are discriminatory and are fuelling racist attitudes towards Nubians, allegedly contributing to playground bullying of dark-skinned children. The episode seems to have galvanised members of the Nubian community, who originate from southern Egypt and north Sudan, the descendants of the founders of the Nubian kingdom, one of Africa’s earliest black civilisations, which flourished along the banks of the Nile some 3,000 years BC.

The singer has apologised profusely for any offence caused and claimed that the song was penned by an Egyptian writer who told her that the term referred to a popular children’s street game (which makes no sense in the context of the song, where the boy is ticking off a list of toys he wants including a teddy bear, Barbie and toy musical organ).

It is one of very few incidents I recall where racism against black Arabs has been addressed or discussed in the media and public arena apart from flash points over the treatment of foreign Arab black refugees. In an infamous incident in 2005, more than 20 Sudanese refugees died after heavy-handed treatment by Egyptian authorities.

While Egypt’s Nubian minority are largely absent from popular culture and the upper echelons of politics and business, some dark-skinned figures such as Mohamed Mounir and the late Ahmad Zaki achieved iconic status. Residual attitudes still remain, though. It always annoyed me that Zaki was often referred to as “the asmar (loosely translated as dark or dusky) artist”. That struck me as casual racism in the guise of fetishised endearment, similar to the way black girls are treated in the streets of Cairo when apparently being complimented on their dark complexions (being referred to as “Kit Kat” just isn’t cute). Perceptions are so entrenched that they are not seen as offensive and find their way into pop media.

The fact that a surgically enhanced fair-skinned Lebanese singer is at the centre of this controversy is perhaps not just bad luck. Lebanese standards of beauty and complexion have taken the Arab world by storm since the resurgence of the Lebanese in media after the end of the Lebanese civil war, further limiting the accepted definition of beauty as light-skinned, catty-eyed and slim-nosed. Fair & Lovely, a popular whitening cream, advertises itself on Arabic TV when a model is rejected for being too dark, only to be ecstatically accepted after a few weeks of applying the magic cream. As Wehbe is the very epitome and embodiment of this standard, the lyric is that much more patronising.

The absence of a culture of political correctness in a society that generally promotes very limited and monolithic ideals of identity means that minority rights suffer, and that most would dismiss the complaint as an overreaction to a mindless children’s tune sung by an equally vacant performer. But it is not only through obvious flare-ups and incidents that discrimination is perpetuated – it is also also through the everyday normalisation of racist address and the apathy this breeds.

The Nubians want a formal apology and an end to airing the song in Egypt. Perhaps this will call attention to an endemic culture of racial stereotyping in the region and raise the standards of reference to darker-skinned Arabs in Egypt and elsewhere.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds




Albums of the decade No 10: Burial – Untrue


HEADLINE FEED // [READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE]

Observer Music Monthly starts the countdown to the best album of the decade with this melancholic masterclass from dubstep’s dark knight

In an era when musicians revealed their private lives to the public via MySpace and Twitter, when even the biggest stars were stripped of enigma by the paparazzi or in the pages of Heat, the idea of anonymity suddenly seemed powerful, if you knew how to use it. So when electronic music prodigy Burial released his self-titled debut album in 2006, declining even to identify himself, let alone submit to photographs and interviews, it certainly lent his soulful take on the era’s key sub-genre – dubstep – extra mystique. By the time its successor, 2007’s Untrue, won a Mercury prize nomination, and Burial was being hyped as the next Aphex Twin – a whiz kid from the margins set to impact on the mainstream – the myth was powerful enough for one tabloid to start a campaign to name him.

In the end, Burial saved them the bother by quickly “outing” himself as William Bevan, a young south Londoner reared on 1990s drum’n'bass and garage. Untrue married the former’s sense of scale with the latter’s fleetness of foot, adding a sadness that was unique to Bevan. It was soaked in a particularly urban melancholy: the 3am blues of In McDonald’s was instantly recognisable to anyone who’s ever been stuck in a fast food outlet in the early hours with only a styrofoam cup of coffee for warmth. While other dubstep artists grew colder and more alienated, Bevan outstripped his peers by heading in the opposite direction, conjuring emotion from disembodied female vocal samples and old videogames. These were explicit links between rave’s past and its thriving offspring in the present, who were still plugging away in the underground, occasionally yielding up something truly special.

Buy this Sunday’s Observer for the full top 50 countdown, plus an interview with the winner.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds




Elizabeth Söderström, the opera star who had it all | Martin Kettle


HEADLINE FEED // [READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE]

The Swedish soprano was not just a great singer and actor, but a remarkable woman

The newspaper obituaries of opera singers, which are invariably written by anorak-coated music critics, too often take a standard and not very interesting form. Born. Studied with. Made debut as. First appeared in this country as. Much admired in the roles of X, Y and Z. Triumphed as this or that. Retired early ― or late. Much loved. Now dead. Usually accompanied by a nice photo in costume.

Just occasionally, however, a singer is too interesting and too rounded a
human being to be confined within that dull mould. There was an example of that last week in the obituaries of the remarkable Armenian- Greek soprano Arda Mandikian, who I confess was barely a name to me but whose life and art would clearly be worth a full biography. Now, all too rapidly after the death of a great southern European soprano, comes the death of a great northern European one, and one who, like Mandikian, can simply not be adequately recalled within the list of the roles that she sang.

Elizabeth Söderström was not so much a great soprano – though she was one ― as a great actor and a remarkable woman. I can tell you when I heard her first ― at Covent Garden as the Countess in The Marriage of Figaro. And I can tell you when I heard her last ― the New York Met 10 years ago in her farewell performances as a very different Countess, in Tchaikovsky’s The Queen of Spades. I can tell you some of the roles I heard her sing, too ― Mélisande, Madeleine and Katya Kabanova among them.

The feeling that touched an audience in a Söderström performance, though, was not the response to the voice, lovely though that was. It was the response to the person. Söderström possessed a remarkable ability to communicate the personality of the character she was portraying by drawing on things within her own personality. I do not in the slightest degree mean that she always played herself ― as Pavarotti did or Bartoli does. She could not have been more different when she portrayed Katya or Madeleine. What you always got from her was intelligence and empathy. You cared about her character because you cared about Söderström. Everything she did was always interesting. You could, I suppose, say that she was a superb actor, which she was, but that would not capture the presence and humanity that she always conveyed. She was a giver to an audience, all the time.

I was once told a story about Söderström that may help to convey how her artistry burned. She was rehearsing the Countess Madeleine at Glyndebourne under John Pritchard. The contract with the orchestra meant that Pritchard had to stop the rehearsal on the dot, or else the musicians would start qualifying for overtime, which could not be afforded. The rehearsal went slowly, and had only reached part way through the magical closing scene for the soprano when the deadline was reached. In the pit, Pritchard promptly put down his baton. The orchestra stopped and began packing up. Söderström, in full flow and unprepared for the break, looked as if she had been physically struck down by the sudden end of the rehearsal. In tears, she refused to stop, and sang her part unaccompanied to the end.

She was such a nice woman too. I only met her once, at the court theatre at Drottningholm outside Stockholm where she was artistic director for a few years in the mid-1990s. “Hello,” she said as I arrived for my appointment, “I have been so looking forward to this. Let’s go and have some lunch and you can tell me about English politics.” She laughed a lot. She told great stories. She was a great talker. Meeting her was like meeting a favourite relative.

Many years ago Söderström appeared on Desert Island Discs. Unlike some sopranos, who choose only records by other sopranos and sometimes only records they have made themnselves, I remember that Söderström chose a wonderfully eclectic selection. One of her choices was a really grungey heavy metal track ― I can’t remember who it was by. Why did you choose that, she was asked? Because my son likes playing it all the time, very loudly, and it will remind me of him, she replied.

With some singers, what matters is the voice. With others, it’s the stage presence. Söderström had both the voice and the presence. But she had something even more special, her life-enhancing personality and warmth which infused every aspect of her artistry. Many singers attract admiration. A few attract worship. Söderström, on the other hand, attracted love.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds




Albums of the decade No 9: Salif Keita – Moffou


HEADLINE FEED // [READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE]

West Africa produced many outstanding releases during the noughties, but the Malian singer’s stark and haunting album was the most remarkable

By normal industry standards, waiting until you’re 53 to make the best album of your career is perhaps leaving it a bit late. But then not much about Salif Keita’s story is normal.

Was it a blessing or a curse for this Malian teenager – already singled out for being albino, and of royal descent – to find that he had one of the most remarkable voices anybody in the neighbourhood had ever heard? On the one hand, it set him apart and ahead of the competition to be invited to sing with two leading west African bands during the 1970s. On the other, it led to expectations that perhaps Keita could be something more than the most famous singer in west Africa – what about conquering the rest of the world? In 1987, the album Soro, expensively and elaborately produced in Paris, announced Keita’s arrival in the English-speaking world.

For the following 15 years, it was almost as if he wilfully defied the hopes and expectations of those who had supported him, insisting on electric guitarists and synthesiser players in his recordings and for his live shows, despite entreaties that his music should sound less like Phil Collins and Peter Gabriel and more Malian.

Finally, astonishingly, in 2002 Keita relented and delivered the album Moffou, which was exactly what his fans had been praying for. First impressions were that this change of tack was mostly acoustic, but there are many subtle interventions of electric guitar and electronic effects. It might feel like a natural, spontaneous recording, but clearly a lot of thought went into it at every stage, from the songwriting to the arrangements and the post-production – and, of course, the singing. If the plan was to deliver a classic album, it succeeded.

One of Keita’s distinctive qualities as a songwriter is to set his own voice against female vocalists, and virtually every track here showcases this skill, starting with Yamore, a duet with the Cape Verdean singer Cesária Évora. The combination of the two voices seemed counterintuitive, with Keita being typically extravagant and Évora being laidback. But it works brilliantly, and behind them both, those gorgeous backing vocals answer and comment.

Two other tracks stand out as the pinnacles of a consistently lovely record. On Moussolou, Keita’s tribute to women, his gentle vocal is carried along by rippling guitars and percussion. On the haunting Baba, a traditional instrument plays an echoing melody in the background.

Moffou signalled what was to become a hugely successful 10 years for Malian music – in fact, the decade would end with a raft of pop and indie acts looking to the country for inspiration. West Africa provided several outstanding albums during the noughties, but most musicians would surely tip their hat to Keita’s album as being the pinnacle.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds




The Tsarina’s Slippers | Opera review


HEADLINE FEED // [READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE]

Royal Opera House, London

Composers’ attitudes to their own works are often curious. Tchaikovsky believed The Tsarina’s Slippers (Cherevichki in Russian; more correctly “little boots” in English) was his finest opera. Posterity has questioned his judgment and will probably continue to do so in the wake of this expensive-looking production that combines the forces of the Royal Opera and the Royal Ballet. It doesn’t, by any means, make a case for the work as a lost masterpiece.

Tchaikovsky’s source was Nikolai Gogol’s story Christmas Eve, about Oxana, a wilful Ukrainian girl who agrees to marry her blacksmith boyfriend Vakula if he gets her some of Catherine the Great’s footwear. In order to do so, Vakula forces into his service a none-too-bright devil, who is one of the several would-be lovers of his witchy mother Solokha. Their phantasmagoric Christmas Eve journey allows Tchaikovsky to contrast folksy Ukrainean vigour with rarefied 18th-century St Petersburg, as well as painting a rather questionable portrait of a unified Russian empire, blithely preparing for the festive season.

The material is uneven, though. The dances are delightful, while Vakula’s moments of doubt permit Tchaikovsky to examine male vulnerability, where he is, of course, supreme. The rest of it, however, is charming if insubstantial. Tchaikovsky, who could turn against his own music if he considered it too self-revealing, probably adored Cherevichki because it is safe and a bit anonymous.

Francesca Zambello’s big, gaudy staging plays at times to the opera’s weaknesses by emphasising spectacle at the expense of character. There are dancing bears and whirling Cossacks. Catherine’s court spills across the stage from beneath the skirts of a huge gilded statue of the Empress. Choreographer Alastair Marriott serves up mock Petipa in St Petersburg and an elegant divertissement, reminiscent of Ashton’s Ondine, for the water nymphs who distract Vakula on his journey.

Musically, things could be tighter. The opera needs a stronger conductor than the rather routine Alexander Polianichko. Both Maxim Mikhailov’s devil and Larissa Diadkova’s lubricious Solokha were having problems with their high notes on opening night, while Olga Guryakova’s Oxana was unremittingly loud. On the other hand, Vsevolod Grivnov is a fabulous Vakula, convincing you that he has the soul of a poet in the body of a nerd. And the great Sergei Leiferkus makes a brief but show-stealing appearance as His Excellency, Catherine’s nameless lover.

Until 8 December. Box office: 020-7304 4000.

• This article was amended on Monday 23 November 2009. The original stated that the devil’s role was taken by Vladimir Matorin. This has been corrected.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds




Odds’n'ends (lost time is not found again) | Michael Tomasky


HEADLINE FEED // [READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE]

Here is a rather vicious attack on Rich Rod from a cbssports.com analyst. It seems that Michigan’s worst back-to-back seasons in nearly 50 years are … Lloyd Carr’s fault!
 
Here is a video of one of the more interesting trick plays you’ll ever see, from a Nov. 14 game between two small colleges. The no-look pass. And yes, this is football, not basketball.
 
Apropos the headline, you are aware by now I assume that Bob Dylan is releasing a Christmas album. I haven’t been able to bring myself to listen to any of the released track snippets. Please don’t tell me.
 
As one of you pointed out last re my Fox News doctored-footage video, I misspoke when discussing which events Fox had fibbed about. I said the 9-12 tea party march and a recent Palin book-tour event. It was actually the Michelle Bachmann Capitol Hill event and a Palin book-tour stop. Sorry about that. As for our joke footage, we were originally hoping to use footage of girls screaming at the Beatles, which I think would have been pretty hilarious. But we weren’t allowed. The redoubtable Glenn, our video man, did quite nicely under the circumstances with the “soccer” footage.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds




U2 to headline Glastonbury


HEADLINE FEED // [READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE]

Bono and co are slated to play the Pyramid stage’s top slot for the festival’s 40th anniversary

U2 will headline next year’s Glastonbury festival, it was confirmed today. Bono and co have been slated for the Pyramid stage’s top spot on Friday 25 June, in what will be their first ever appearance at the festival. Organiser Michael Eavis had promised something special for Glastonbury’s 40th anniversary, and in booking a band who have been rumoured to headline every year since the mid 1980s, he’s done just that.

“The 26-year-old rumour has finally come true,” Eavis said. “At last, the biggest band in the world are going to play the best festival in the world! Nothing could be better for our 40th anniversary party. And there are even more surprises in the pipeline.”

Eavis added: “We’ve been trying for years … and now we’ve finally made it happen. I’m sure they will pull out all the stops to make next year’s Glastonbury the most memorable ever.”

U2 will fly to the UK to play the Somerset festival in the middle of their North American tour.

Earlier this year, Bono told BBC Radio 1 that U2 had not been confirmed to play the festival in 2010, but was sure they would play Glastonbury at some point. “I know lots of people who love music want us to. It’s something we’re working up our whole life to do.”

Tickets for next year’s Glastonbury sold out in October after organisers decided to release them early – a scheme that proved successful last year. The festival will take place between Friday 25 and Sunday 27 June 2010. So far, no other headliners have been confirmed. The Guardian is the official media sponsor of Glastonbury festival.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds




Fans splash the cash for Michael Jackson memorabilia


HEADLINE FEED // [READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE]

Items belonging to King of Pop fetch prices far in excess of those predicted at New York auction

The King of Pop, Michael Jackson, has turned out to be an auctioneers’ dream celebrity as prices for Jacko memorabilia outstrip even those for items that belonged to Elvis Presley or Marilyn Monroe.

Thousands of bidders from around the world were attracted to the Jackson auction at the Hard Rock Cafe in New York, where auctioneers were taken aback by the big prices paid for some of the late star’s belongings.

The rhinestone-encrusted white glove worn by Jackson when he first Moonwalked in 1983 was sold for $350,000 (£212,000) – nine times the expected price.

The glove was one of 70 items, including a jacket, a fedora hat, lyrics, drawings, autographs and even a dental mould, which sold for $2m, well above pre-sale estimates of $120,000.

The jacket worn by Jackson on his 1989 Bad tour was sold for $225,000, while the fedora went for $22,000.

The most bizarre item was the upper dental mould used to fit the singer with animal fangs for his 1983 Thriller video. It sold for more than $10,000.

Jackson’s glove is an iconic item, appearing in one of the world’s most copied dance moves. It was also used by MTV this year in a Jackson tribute and promotional video for its video music awards.

The glove was bought by Hoffman Ma, a Hong Kong businessman, on behalf of a hotel in Macau, China, where it will go on display.

Celebrity auctions bring rich pickings. Earlier this year, Barbra Streisand auctioned more than 400 personal items, including dresses, wigs and a baby grand piano, to raise money for charity.

Recently, Presley memorabilia including locks of the star’s hair – allegedly from his 1958 army haircut – and concert scarves sold for thousands of dollars in Chicago.

And the Bernie Madoff car boot sale will soon be upon us, with lots including a duck decoy belonging to the convicted fraudster going on sale.

But it’s hard to believe that Tom Jones’s strides or Leona Lewis’s frocks would hold quite the same value. Any suggestions for pop memorabilia yet to come to auction that could bring in the dizzying sums raised by Jackson’s auction?


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds